Is it the case that “young people nowadays don’t want to have children anymore?” ?
I find the question somewhat irritating.Is it not rather to observe that parents who are now young may be able to do not want to have children at the moment, but do not necessarily want to have children (more)?
Since the 1970s, the trend towards later family formation has been evident.Meanwhile, the average of first-borns is just under 30 years old.
(cf.Birth trends and family situation in Germany, 2012, https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publi…).
Why this is so is certainly based on socialthinking.
The desire for emancipated women to be economically independent or the desire for a career of their own (this goes beyond mere economic independence) makes the There is a need to focus first on school qualifications and training.
Federal Statistical Office, Microcensus 2016, https://www.destatis.de/DE/Press… )
However, this phenomenon is not only to be seen in the social classes with an academic level of education, which is why I suspect and observe that demands on a certain lifestyle with correspondingly necessary income play a major role. to play.There are parents who require their own offspring to own a home or a high standard of living. These claims are not possible at the beginning of a professional career or even without a professional qualification.
Here’s something from the sewing box:
My wife and I did not opt for an extremely early start to the family (compared to older generations), but still opted for a family start before the end of our academic qualification.When we had our first son, I was 27 years old and my wife was 25 years old. Why?
The right moment for the foundation of the family – will never exist.
For one thing, there will never be a perfect time for children in life.As a young adult, the focus is only on sufficient school qualifications, training or entry into the profession. Maybe you still want to live your life. A little later, one would first like to concentrate on the profession and “come in” , i.e. first arrive a year or two in the professional life and enjoy first successes, or perhaps even first the ‘master’ or .50. ‘Technicians’.
Then new positions and fields of work may be available, but they may require a little more commitment.In addition, one has developed a few more time-intensive hobbies in the meantime, maybe you would like to see and discover a few distant countries or simply experience the time with the partner or the friend /girlfriend for two.
In any case, there will always be arguments, in any situation, for an inappropriate time for an immediate start to start a family.
Our reasoning was: If there is always an inappropriate time, you could just as well start planning your family early and thus create ‘free spaces’ for later.
It used to be younger – it’s better to keep up.
Keyword “start early”: Starting early also means being young.If I compare 25-year-olds with 35- or 40-year-olds, one thing quickly becomes clear: the physical constitution does not get better with age. This is accompanied by stress or athletic fitness.
As you get older, it becomes harder to keep up with your children – not necessarily in infancy, where short nights are also a real challenge that you have to put away as a parent – but definitely a little later.Children move constantly and demand this from their parents in a healthy relationship.
Different worlds of life.
I’m pretty sure that “nonsense activities” strengthens the bond and trust between parents and children.If, on the other hand, you are much older, this is no longer so possible. Just the cognitive “reasonable lock” of such child chatter has already been coined 10 years longer in a 40-year-old and may be a bigger obstacle to getting involved completely with his children and sometimes on the couch to bounce around.
When I watch my three children ‘sing around’ with them because I was allowed to enter their children’s world after their invitation, I realize that it makes them incredibly happy and I realize that they totally trust me.
With increasing age distance to the children, many people also increasingly understand their world of life.Dealing with digital media, content of interests or everyday discussions between your own children and peers tends to be foggy the older you are.
We believe that children are no better off if a home and many additional resources are available through financial buying potential guaranteed by a high income or parental financial capital.Presumably, it is even more conducive to the personality of the child if children learn that one has to do without them or make compromises, which may be possible. would not be necessary if one had almost infinite (financial) resources at its disposal and could use them at any time.
Rather, in our eyes, personal effort and commitment play a role in how well a child can do.In our view, this personal effort (affection, love, playtime, joint activities) cannot be replaced by institutions or institutions if one simply lacks oneself: one can thus poorly “outsource” one’s loving and personal upbringing, without compromising the quality of the relationship between parents and children. In other words, nothing is better than parenting by mum and dad.