It is believed that these are the first harbingers of the Big Bang, but that cannot be the case.Excerpt from the blog ” My Universe:
Can background radiation and the Big Bang, within a 4D space, be in a reliable relationship at all?
- As just in the previous contribution was mentioned:
Everything is just a perspective of the relationships of spatial positions from the edge to the center or vice versa.
Thus, the centre is always the common point of reference for all perspectives. But this is precisely the problem of all relativistic considerations.
The problem is not the perspective or the speed, but the direction of movement.And that problem is only manifested in the fulcrum, in the center of our universe, because in the case of a big bang, it does not have the characteristics to be considered relativistic, because every direction of movement is away from the center and there is no such thing as the Possibility to encounter something that exists. This does not allow interaction with other things, nor does it involve the formation of other elements.
There is no spatial geometric position to which something moves, there is only one center from which something moves away.How is anything to deal with? And since we already suspect a curvature of space, the movement could eventually reach the point of its origin again. But if the Big Bang was unique, then there should be nothing left, because it is on its way to this center of the Big Bang and still has nothing in a relationship with which things can then meet.
There is only the possibility that BEING is the most natural state of existence that has evolved over time into our causally ordered world.So it can ‘bigbang’forever and carry on like this forever, because the crooked thing about this story is the only reason that things always and everywhere meet and interact with.
So the difference lies in the fact that on the one hand everything in our universe distances itself from each other and on the other hand everything can therefore meet.The outdated model of the Big Bang offers only the possibility of escaping, away from the center without any possibility of encounter, and it requires another singular cause, which leads to an interactive encounter.
But if I simply accept the big bang of the standard model of physics and ignore the contradiction, there is still a contradiction between older arguments and their conclusions.
There is, for example, background radiation. According to the standard model, the background radiation should be the image of the Big Bang. For this, I again apply the principle of the direction of movement.
Light falling on a measuring position can fall from all directions to the measuring point.However, only such light whose direction points exactly to this point, because light with a different direction would move past the measuring point. Thus, the observer only gets to see the things that seem to come from a spherical horizon. Thus the observer believes that he is always the center of events.
But the background radiation should have passed our place a long time ago and wherever it moves, this is in no case the direction that leads to our measuring point.The photons of the background radiation must have somehow experienced a u-turn of the direction of the movement, so that they arrive here at the measuring point. But those photons cannot yet have encountered any cause, for they are only the first harbingers of the present edge of the universe. This, in turn, contradicts the standard model of the Big Bang for the 2nd time.
Apart from that, photons are significantly faster than the speed of expansion.And for the third time, this again contradicts the standard model of the Big Bang.
In fact, it has long since been confirmed that matter cannot move at the speed of light.And we only see photons of matter that meet our measuring point.Therefore, it is not a contradiction that photons can overtake the supposed edge of the universe. For in view of this contradiction in time, it would finally be possible to assume that the universe is spreading concretely at the speed of light. But only the photons of matter can capture – but not the first photons of the Big Bang.
Even if the Big Bang only created the first background radiation after 400,000 years, which could have any direction, those photons would have moved past us long ago.
So the direction of movement determines the arrival in the observer’s eye but the temperature, frequency or density of the photon is determined by the edge of the place, i.e. from the distance of the photon to the center.And this is not a point that corresponds to a relativity, but it is a radius of the place to the center of the universe, which has no dimension and is regarded by us human beings as time. So the point where everything turns and turns and keeps the whole universe moving with the length of a Planck pixel.
how?This explains in the next article – Does the Big Bang need no singularity at all and is the question of “What was before?” unnecessary?