What is the term ‘rationalisation’?

In general and up-to-date, rationalization means bringing environments, not only of nature, including the interior, including physical, psychological and intelligent qualities and abilities, into an orderly state (see, among other things, house building, school, culture, technology, etc.) and hold.

Rationality is, from the current human point of view, a state of order which man imposes in his sphere of action in his environment, including nature, by his “spiritual”, i.e. supposedly self-invented principles of order, including his regulation of his own, which he describes as the civilization of nature and the world, which he himself tries to assume the highest role, which is only due to him.

In fact, in this consideration, man is subject to some elementary errors:

The most important of these is that he does not realize that man is not the source of rationality and corresponding orders, but that any kind of rationality, rationalbehavior, etc., is due to the NATURAL LOGICAL principles. of this universe from which it originated.

This means that logical principles are not conceived by humans, but logical principles are at the root of nature and are only found and symbols edified by man there.

Consequently, mathematics is not invented by man either, but man has only put the logical principles he finds in NATURE in mathematical symbols and claims, to this day, that he is also the inventor of mathematics, and thus also the creator of the Logical Laws.

But since man discovers all the logical principles only in nature, he is not its inventor, but only, at best, its discoverer, and only to the extent that he can discover only those in nature according to his intelligence, all of which are the logical principles of the which he cannot even discover due to the lack of insufficient own-species IQ.

This leads to a completely different need to consider the concept of rationalization:

Since all forms of nature are based on ALL the logical principles underlying nature, human beings are able, according to their IQ and cultural development, to recognize only very limited logical principles in nature, which means that human beings only simpler principles accessible to him, while nature is based on ALL natural logical principles.

As a result, man uses only the simple logic principles (which he calls rationalization), which inevitably leads to an impoverishment in the spread of natural logics, which is shown in reality by the fact that human beings are predominantly Builds houses with four corners, creates fields in rectangles, clears original forest systems to create monocultures, etc., etc.

Thus, human beings generate an environment of impoverished nature, since nature is the result of considerably extensive structured logical constructs, which are continuously reduced by humans to simplified Geometry and invoices.

Consequently, any act of rationalization is a reduction to simple elements and constructs, i.e. to thinning to only a few logical principles, which amounts to an impoverishment of diversity, and thus causes human beings in their environment considerable dangers, which are ultimately attack his own stock and survival as long as it does not leave enough room for a naturally more diverse, more complex use of logical principles.

Rationalization is therefore based on the error that it itself is the cause of progress in every respect, but in reality represents only a narrowing of logical functions to very few principles, which ultimately essentially only represent the human needs, and thus at the same time constitutes an obstacle to the surrounding natural development.

At the same time, man thinks that he himself is, so to speak, the engine of progress in the world, in nature, far beyond his own civilization, since he himself is the teacher for others, but at least it can be if one would only listen to him.

In fact, man is only part of nature, and thus only part of a single overall development within this universe, because man is by no means independent of any development, and ultimately not even that, because man only follows everyone in the universe. is effective logical principles, and he is therefore not in any way able to do or create anything independently of everything else.

Thus, man is by no means the leader of a development towards rationality and civilization, but man sees himself only from himself, and therefore does not realize that he is not the developer of the world, but that he is only not able to the world regardless of its own self-referential views.

Man is thus only “pushed” from the world race, and thus man is always surprised at the consequences of logical principles on the further course of things, only that he cannot classify the discovered principles as not by himself generated order causes.

See also the following link:

Ron Heide’s answer to taxes do we control our thoughts or do we control our thoughts?

Leave a Reply