Heisenberg…. and Shrodinger to extend.
That is the very short answer.Why? Because of the ‘ uncertainty relationship ‘.
Freewill is an abused term in a religious sense, a metaphysical ‘ paradox ‘ in a philosophical sense and an unworkable form of ‘ chaos-thinking ‘ in science.
If we take the ‘ Big bang ‘ as the basis of the genesis of the Universe (which is the most logical, given the knowledge that mankind has gained), then everything is actually the result of that one moment.Everything after that is a crystalization, but according to many, so it is fully established. Especially if you are trying to intersect neuroscience and psychology. After all, if all matter in the Universe Tempo reel (causally linked from any moment to moment) is linked, then there could be no change by our thoughts (which are the result of physical processes). However, this only works if you assume that the effects in our brains are the consequences of previous processes and then shut things down.
Is the universe in a constant change that is due to things that cannot (easily) be altered?Yes. This is also where quantum physics is about. However, there is a small crux. We humans are different from animals (which are quite similar to the changes in their brains), in the sense that our brains are in a different way (we have a much larger prefrontal cortex). The feedback because signals can be sent in our brains gives us the opportunity to make choices. This causes this type of question to arise in the twilight plane between philosophy and science.
If quantum physics and free will exist both, then the fact that we are the one investigating evidence that the other exists.
This is a very interesting question.
The answer is, there is no connection.The problem is that the body consists of atoms and atoms that abide by rules/laws of nature. From that argument would be to make that there is no free will, because everyone is a collection of atoms. Luckily, you could say that there is quantum physics and that it is based on chance. It is therefore not predetermined whether a particle has an orientation of 1 or-1. In a way, you could say that there is “free will”.
Unfortunately, this argument on closer inspection is not actually valid. Quantum physics also takes off outside the body, which would mean that quantum physical things in your body behave differently than these processes outside your body.That is because you can influence the processes within your body while the processes outside your body are determined by probability theory.
Suppose you would assume that quantum physics provides free will, that would mean that you can somehow influence these processes.The question then is, which part of you exercises influence on these processes. Are the atoms in your body that adhere to natural laws, or is it the quantum physics itself? There is a contradiction, if you yourself are influenced by the atoms in your body then there is no free will, because atoms thus adhere to the laws of nature. On the other hand, quantum physics that influences quantum physics should have a measurable effect, because quantum physics would behave differently in the brain than in the outside world.
Then the logical question is, is there another way you can fill the puzzle with which there is free will. The answer is yes, there are 2 ways that it could, but these ways that are not very much desirable.The first way is a God, who states that quantum physics behaves differently outside the brain than in the brain, which I think is not very difficult to imagine. The logical follow-up question is then, how come there is a god who has power over these phenomena. The next solution is just as terrible and that is that we live in a simulation. The idea behind this is that the universe that simulates us does not have to have the same laws as our universe.
The logical conclusion is that: We have no free will or we live in a simulation or there is a god.Of course, it can be said that life in a simulation has roughly the same effect as a god, because the person/civilization that controls this simulation is just like a god. In addition, you could also simulate a god. It is a very interesting issue.
Something that is free does not follow a set of predictable rules, according to classical physics everything follows predictable rules, so something that is ‘ free ‘ then is not possible.
But according to quantum physics, there are things that are completely unpredictable.So it could be that they are free, if so, then free will can exist in physics.