There is no objective reality.
With object, science usually means the object of research which is outside the researcher.
Now man does not stand outside the ‘ reality ‘ but is part of it.Thus, thoughts and feelings, desires and desires and even delutions and erroneous ideas are part of reality. This will not everyone agree with me, so this is my opinion or insight.
We know the reality outside of us through our senses.In this sense, we call reality the reality that is known. Now we don’t know everything. Are you witnessing somewhere then you know what you have seen and heard, otherwise you know it only from second or third hand or not at all. For example, the Prime Minister’s talks with the ministers. You can only assume that these conversations take place. Or a picture of a black hole. Then you also assume that that photo is consistent with all the data captured and edited from the universe. In This sense there are also filters between reality and perception.
On the basis of this kind of considerations I believe that alone I exist.I live my life in my world. It does not matter whether that reality around me is ‘ real ‘ or an illusion. I assume that the other people may actually exist in their reality and that the world outside of us, the world we live in, also exists, but everything ultimately exists only because I exist.
You may think it is an erroneous reasoning. Temperature does not exist by the thermometer, but it is right from the thermometer that it is correct.
It is totally irrelevant what the reality is. What we are talking about is what the shared reality is, what you have in common with others.And it’s not that crazy to call that 芒 鈧?虄the Reality 芒 鈧劉. For 芒 鈧?虄the Reality 芒 鈧劉 is nothing but an appointment, a shared appointment. And you know: No one who could oppose it.
There is only one reality.With believing that has nothing to do with it.
The objective world, but we only know it as “the world that people believe in.”Hopefully there is a good agreement between the two, because otherwise you will soon get into trouble. With serious problems, you actually have to deal with a human (or a group) who is psychotic: their worldview has little resemblance to the objective world, and this manifests itself in severe dysfunction.
The question is logically impossible.You can’t 芒 鈧?艙geloven芒 鈧?in the 芒 鈧?艙objective reality 芒 鈧? Those 芒 鈧?艙is芒 鈧? there has such a thing as silly as human 芒 鈧?艙belie芒 鈧?by definition nothing to do with it.
That 芒 鈧?艙objective reality 芒 鈧?is by definition unknowable, all human and instrumentality experienced is subjective.All. The word 芒 鈧?艙objectief芒 鈧?is a nice concept, which ironically is not usable in reality. For it implies a perception without observer. And that is unintelligible.
I believe that this objective reality exists, incidentally.She is only for the present human brain unknowable, as a whole. Perhaps enlightened spirits can perceive her-but for the moment they cannot communicate this observation.
Also, I do not believe that the two possibilities you offer are the only ones, so even there the demand is deficient-and can indeed be classified as 芒 鈧?艙intellectually inrecht芒 鈧?because they present those two possibilities as single attendees, while clearly Many more ways to approach or consider (our experience of) reality.
I agree with most of the answers already given.Objective reality does not exist.
Everything you see, hear, smell, taste, groped, yes even thinks or experiences as a certain emotion, is produced by your brain.They are not the same in any human being. That’s why you’ll find some things beautiful or tasty that I find ugly or dirty.
That means that everyone has a different reality, the world is the same for no one.In this sense, it is totally pointless to engage In discussions on this. No one has made his own brains, and therefore not how they work or react to things. They are a conspiracy of all sorts of parts from the universe, added from the moment your mother became pregnant with you, what they ate, physical conditions etc.
That is why free will does not exist: your brain generates a certain action, and your body acts there, e.g. flights, react in a certain way, make decisions.You do not take the decision FIRST, because you are a product of your brain.
This is a funny question.She is about acting and believing. For each act, the outcome will only be withdrawn at a later date. That there is, however, a later time than it will now exist, is nothing but faith.There is no sound proof that the sun will rise again tomorrow. So why should you act, if you don’t believethat?
Acting in the now is thus in an objective reality the consequences of those acts are always in an believed reality.
I would start at the other end: the world that people believe in and act on is an unrealistic one, as all diversifications and discrepancies indicate.
[Otherwise advertising would not work either:-)
So all “believed realities” are far from reality, which means that you have to look for them in a focused and logical way: science (and science only).The only instrument of detection that mankind has [and a not unkind, to express it softly.