no.The Sholes layout was created because the alphabetical layouts that existed before were easy to learn and presented to potential buyers, but in actual use were just rubbish. He argued that an efficient keyboard must place the letters most commonly used in English in places where they are easiest to hit, and created a long-term reference to the frequency of letters and the Series of experiments a keyboard that allows exactly this to allow typists to accelerate at unprecedented speed, as fast as their fingers and mechanics could withstand it.
This was the first keyboard layout to be useful in practice, and was often used by employees who wrote off telegraph messages – for the purpose of making a few small changes.
This created a market for the modern typewriter, and the expansion of business and government records allowed it to flourish at the beginning of the 20th century.The mechanism underwent a number of other revisions, mainly by Remington and other early-market companies, to further speed up typing by reducing mechanical constraints (which were reduced until the invention of electrical Typewriter with its spherical head passed by IBM).
Remington further distorted the layout by making some random changes to thwart existing patents, but the point was contentious.Remington conquered the market and her version of the Sholes layout became the de facto standard.
And, of course, it’s not optimal.However, careful studies by the US Navy and later several universities have shown that the Sholes – or QWERTY – layout is so close to the optimum that another layout (especially Dvorak) if it is really superior is too tight to measure write speed, at least). This is confirmed by the fact that the worlds recorded for write speed have constantly moved back and forth between the sholes and other layouts. If the perceived suboptimality of her design had really played a role, it would have remained in the dust long ago.
These studies have shown that for each modern keyboard, the writing speed is determined by effort and practice, with no measurable effect on the layout.So if you want to speed up typists, use your time and money better to have trained typists practice QWERTY than to train them on anything else. Moreover, studies in the 1970s and 80s, still in the time of the writing pool, found that professional typists rarely write more than 35 words per minute in practice, regardless of their peak performance in writing speed tests.
Now the Dvorak followers and the “cult of the superior keyboard” will be a sign that their favorite keyboard is more comfortable, even if all of this is true.Well, then use it. No one stops you. But the human hand is one of the most variable biomechanical devices in nature. What works for you doesn’t work for everyone. So experiment and find your Sweet Spot.
However, recent scientific evidence shows that the ergonomic performance as well as the speed is not determined by the keyboard layout, but rather by the posture, habit and design of the workstations.Basically, any flat keyboard is ill-suited for adapting to human anatomy, but any contoured keyboard is harder to use.
Life, as always, is a sack of compromise.