More children are in youth care. Is there something wrong with education?

Shortly through the bend, more children in youth care will probably have to deal partly with the way society has changed since the middle of the last century.Urbanisation, dezuiling and individualisation have ensured that people’s social networks have been reduced, or at least changed, while the responsibility for educating children has been increasingly strengthened by parents. The current initiative of the Government to reach a participatory society is how it seeks to solve a part of the problems from the political perspective.
In the rest of my answer, I will unpack the above theorems a little further, so that you ‘ n get a better picture of what exactly is said here and why that is interesting.

The modern problem of education is therefore twofold:
1.By dezuiling, responsibility is less in the public sphere and more in parents, while the social networks have become smaller. In addition, we see public bodies conducting a monitoring function on those responsibilities, thereby carrying out a certain degree of coercion.
2.Findings in science such as developmental psychology and pedagogy create a complex picture of parenting tasks. In addition, commercial companies are the uncertainties of parents going out. This has meant that the parenting task has become considerably more complex and burdensome. Rosenfeld and Wise (2001) Speak of hyperparenting: The suggestion that each parent has the possibility but also the duty to construct the perfect child.

So despite the decrease in the resources to carry out the parenting tasks and the increasingly complex expectations about these parenting tasks, the responsibility towards parents has risen.According to Furedi (2001, 2006), complete paranoia has arisen around parenthood. He partly blames policymakers and thechild protection industry, the (commercial) services that are involved in the uncertainty of parents.Those would undermine the self-confidence and the authority of parents.

And here’s why this answers your question: there is one way to escape that enormous parental responsibility when problems arise in education, NML.By diagnosing a disorder. The personal responsibility culture and the epidemic of ADHD-like disorders could sometimes be part of the same phenomenon (Bolt, 2010). A clinical diagnosis gives access to the expertise that overburdened parents need to meet the high expectations of the parenting tasks, and so psychiatry has inadvertently become an outflight.

This way of analysis is quite influential in the Netherlands, with researchers such as Boutellier and Winter.They urge a ‘ pedagogical Civil Society ‘, or a participatory society around the educational tasks.The Government has taken this message to heart, because it also reflects the need for the VVD to cut down on public services. Shortly through the bend, citizens ‘ initiatives and activation hopes to restore the community spirit, so that parents can, through their social network or parent meetings, be able to carry the responsibility for education with the least possible interference from Experts.

I personally think there is a thing to say for this way of thinking, despite the fact that the solution also immediately creates new pitfalls.But that’s probably for ‘ n other times, this answer is long and complicated enough.
This answer is more or less a summary of the essay ‘ from the Opnutritional cramp to the parenting force ‘ by Micha de Winter, from the collection ‘ caring for ourselves ‘.This answer is also just one of the many angles that one can take when it comes to a subject that is as complicated as this, and there is a lot of room for nuance. I hope you find this perspective as interesting as myself, and have read this answer with pleasure.

I think this is a bit similar to the supposedly increase in autism diagnoses.It is not that it was not before; It is just that we have a lot more attention today.

A lot of things that happened earlier would no longer be tolerated today.Children who have just stayed at home in a problem situation are now in youth care.

Apart from this, there is of course the evolution that networks are becoming less stable.Here again it is a double evolution: this has largely to do with the fact that a bad marriage becomes less conjured.

So it is largely the result of some 芒 鈧?”generally taken good 芒 鈧? societal evolutions.

Not too short by the bend.

Relatively many immigrant children without parents cross the border.Furthermore, immigrant parents with PTSD/war history and children, is not so much wrong with the education as well as with these traumatized people themselves.

Incidentally, not all youth care is related to home placement.

CBS Statline

I think there is too much pressure on both the parents and the children and that there are more problems.The government wants women and men to work full-time outdoors, but there are only a limited number of hours in the week. Somewhere that is going to wring.

Of course something goes wrong with the education.Namely, the education we received ourselves is not what we needed. I myself have come into contact via PRH with a gentle way to look at myself and have learned to accept what is taught in me.

Often children are now considered to be something we can make to the needs of society and this is the world upside down.

What we need is a society that serves people.A social network that supports us.

What every form of a central state does, however, is centralizing power and thus people are getting less and more in the foreground, but they must serve the state.

What a social network does is help to pick up the stitches where we fall into that lateb.Real friends will appeal to you if you are wrong with your children. Not in a reprithe way, as the government does but in a loving way show the other what is also possible.

I will give a practical example.If a child falls and it starts crying, then there are many educators who comfort the child with words like “sssh, Sssh, your Daramola not cry, it’s not bad”. While crying is a way of expressing emotions for which a child has no words. Up to seven years, children are mainly emotional beings. It is the task of the educator to give words to the emotions that the child feels. I then say things like, “Are you startled? Do you have pain? Where did you hurt? We will rub the pain away. ” While I take the child with me to cherish it. As soon as all emotions are appointed, the child automatically stops crying.

In the other approach, the child learns that his emotions are not ‘ correct ‘ and will not learn to cope with emotions but learn to suppress them or use them to manipulate educators with it.

Mind you, I don’t want to blame anyone for anything, we are all but children of our parents and our time and we all always do our best.SOMD We just need some help from someone else.

Usually there is something wrong with the parents.One-漏-parent families, fighting divorces, or parents who make it all too much by debt, stress, burnout, or addiction.

Also, there may be congenital problems with a child, such as heavy forms of autism, or a heavy body and/or mental disability.This requires a lot of parents, and especially if there are other children in the family, help from youth care is indispensable.

Problems with education are with the help of guidance and coaching to solve well.

Leave a Reply