There is a lot to say.There are also disadvantages to it. Under the line it is in my opinion positive.
I say that on the basis of the recent opinion of the Dutch Bank (DNB) from October 2018.This indicates that, of course, European collective withdrawal is preferable, but that national Dutch policy on CO2 taxation is also an option.
The benefits are ecological and socially.Ecological in the sense that net less CO2 emissions take place, including the changing choice of transport, and also in the sense that people are confronted that the environmental costs they cause must also be paid by them, which It is expected to increase awareness of this responsibility with a positive effect also on other environmentally damaging choices of people.
Socially, there is no objective reason to charge car fuel heavier than aircraft fuel.A CO2 tax can slightly straighten that. Furthermore, a further increase in air traffic for people in the supply and drainage routes is a serious deterioration of their habitat and an attack on health.
Disadvantages are also, especially for certain sectors, but by cleverly spending the tax revenues, the net consequence for the Dutch economy does not have to be negative.
Moreover, all major (Germany, France, GB, Italy) and some smaller economies in the EU already have a fly tax, so the argument of distortion of competition does not exist. A more level playing field has been mentioned earlier.
Fly tax is a bad idea.It means that you are once again putting responsibility to the consumer and not to the carrier. Compare with other forms of public transport and imagine that bus transportation is suddenly taxed with bustax because diesel fuel is bad for the environment.
Recently, I heard that stream services like Spolify, together produce more CO2 emissions than air traffic and that it is better for the environment to turn all CD-ers back.This does not require music tax?
It is therefore a task to burden it instead of burdening it.Let the suppliers be forced, under penalty of high fines, to produce environmentally friendly.
When imposing increases, you only reduce the pollution by excluding consumers who cannot afford it.When committing environmental measures, you can only really ensure a better climate.
The altitude of the flight tax should cover exactly the cost of CO2 capture (the polluter pays).EU or even the UN.
Of each flight is to determine the emitted CO2.The cost of catching off than dividing by the number of passengers, I would say so. But with buses, trains, etc. Then the best transport form (is the cleanest and then thereby the cheapest) will win by market operation.
Is entering a Dutch flight tax a good or bad idea?Why?
At first glance, this seems like a very good idea.But upon further investigation it appears that it is challenging, or flight tax is a good idea.
The arguments for are clear.Entering a flight tax would make flying more expensive, the tax is partly passed on to the consumer. This would make it less likely to fly, and this will have very positive effects on the environment.
However, opponents highlight the consequences of the reduction in air travel.When one stops flying, one does not necessarily stop taking holidays. Holidaymakers who, for financial reasons, no longer go on the plane use alternative means of transport. For example, the car. When car traffic increases in large numbers, this is also bad for the environment.
脗 -‘ This counter-argument sounds convincing, but is far from proven.If it is proven that air tax does not have a positive impact on climate change, then the whole notion of a flyload is total nonsense. But as far as we know, the practice will only show the long-term environmental impacts.
Normative I think it is a good idea to introduce a flight tax.It sends a signal to polluters that the planet is not for free. It forces businesses and holidaymakers to think about their environmental impact. Many scientists have called climate change the defining problem of this century, and they are right.
I realise that there are many economic and counterarguments to consider when it comes to the air tax.I have not included this in the answer because I think the most interesting and relevant part of this discussion is represented by climate problems.
With a flight tax of a few euros no less is flown.A smart consumer buys his ticket abroad, where no flight tax is levied.
No.Tax is extortion or slavery. The mafia is called the Pizzo.
The essence of all slavery consists of in taking the product of Another芒 鈧劉 s labor by force.
It is immaterial whether this force be founded upon ownership of the slave or ownership of the money that (s) he must get to live. [Misattributed to Leo Tolstoy
If the confiscation or extortion of 99 to 100% of the fruits of one’s labor is slavery, at what percentage is it no longer slavery?
Explore-Is taxation theft?An interactive conversation.