How much percent of the money people receive in the assistance goes to housing corporations, insurance companies, supermarkets and clothing stores? And what happens to the economy when all the benefits are stopped in the Netherlands tomorrow?

Interesting question.The benefits are likely to have a positive impact on the economy. Not only the people who receive the benefit benefit from this, but also the people and organisations where the money is spent.

People with a benefit usually do not save so all the money flows back into the economy.Often, much goes back directly to the government, as VAT. About 60 to 80% goes to rent, health care and education for the children. The rest of food and clothing. Few luxury goods are bought. Furniture often used.

It is said that part of the expenditure is not flexible, and that is the necessary expenditure on livelihoods.

If you earn more, you will buy more luxury goods, more often on holiday, etcetera, but above an income you do not give out.It doesn’t matter if you earn two tonnes or three tons per year. It does not provide additional economic growth.

Would benefit from more money than that would have a positive impact on the economy at once.Would millionaires earn less from that would have no negative impact on the economy. It is said that the middle class is the backbone of the economy, which is of course the same.

In several Dickens books you can read well how the English subclass survived without benefits.The current situation in the United States is also not much better. The middle class is under enormous pressure. The people are either tremendously wealthy or can barely come around. Not only does the revolution eat her own children, capitalism is just as hungry.


You can also argue that the benefit makes people lazy.Would they not get money, people would be forced to work. If you want to work then you will get there, it is said. As a cleaner, street vendor, free-range, prostitute, maid, or in hemp cultivation, drug trafficking, etcetera. But it would also give pressure on wages, because everyone wants to work as a box filler.

In my opinion, the abolition of benefits would lead to a substantial reduction in tax, which is particularly the benefit of the rich.At the bottom of the labour market, there is considerable competition among the poor. Economic activity, but also exploitation and abuse.

In this context, the situation in Venezuela is interesting.The Government has perhaps helped the economy to soap, but the government is still loved by the poor. They know what it is to be really poor.

Keynesian economics-Wikipedia

‘, ‘ Fortunately there are many bridges in the Netherlands.Trees can also do wonders. Enjoy your baby on your arm under the bridge. Renting go down. House emergency solved. Housing market collapses. The banks are equally unlucky. The Netherlands is just such a free country as the US. I am glad that I do not live in the Netherlands.

“,” How many percent are going to those listed branches?

I suspect against the 100%.Or even more (building up debts).

If that is stopped, a lot of people have a really hard life.In terms of economics, much more will be transformed into the security industry, fencing, ditches, in the arms trade, martial arts schools, more work in prison and justice and probation.
The end result will not be very much different in terms of money than it is now. But the country is a lot less sociable .Just look at countries where it goes.

The percentage is not that interesting.The question is more what remains to 芒 鈧?艙vrij芒 鈧?disposable income. The answer will amaze you: nothing!

Residential expenses (rent, energy telephone, internet etc.) in the Netherlands (outside Amsterdam) between 700 and 800 euro per month, the sickness cost premium election required at least 芒 ‘ 卢 110,-per person or at least 136,-per month if someone is logged in as a default payer The CAK and the administrative premium must be paid. Depending on the place of residence at least 芒 ‘ 卢 500,-per year to municipal taxes (cleaning law etc.) people with benefits generally have no insurance at all.Apart from the obligated WA insurance for a scooter, driving car wreck etc.

Not being able to pay the last category insurance leads to fines of of a few hundred euros per month.Fines that rise quickly with increases, bailiffs costs etc to about 1400 euros per month.

To answer your question stopping benefits will have as a result

Leave a Reply