# Changing the direction of movements is the mother of all effects? The story of the topology of gravity and the description of what mass is and why it is always confused with matter.

Changing the direction of movements is the mother of all effects?The story of the topology of gravity and the description of what**mass is and why it is always confused with**matter.

–Administrator Posted 31w

Therefore, you have to slide under the colorful balls to read about things that you suddenly can’t understand because you lack the introductory, which you should have known more before, but skipped.

**What determines the direction of movement?**

Every movement is absolutely one-dimensional through space.So each next step should be a 180° position in the once taken direction. Any change of this sequence is only possible by changing the topological state of the space of the next desired position. How the path over a bridge is shorter than the just curved path through the valley.

The problem of all considerations, as always, is the theory of relativity.A moving observer describes from the inside a one-dimensional, completely straight path through a flat plane,

but which in reality led through a topologically deformed landscape of a gravitational field, where the lengths were sometimes more or less shortened,

which then looks like a crooked path on a flat plane from an outside observer.

Similar to a bird flying over mountainous landscapes, the path through the air is one-dimensional and much shorter, rather than the path over mountain and valley.

Also, in the case of constantly changing topological events, the flight time would be decisive for the direction and places of arrival. Thus, some of the next position will no longer be the shortest position, but a different position, which is then in no way the 180° position and thus is also a different direction, from which the next 180° position results in a completely different directions. However, the object of movement always occupies only the shortest position in the direction of 180°.

**What changes the direction of a movement?**

A photon, for example, moves absolutely straight one-dimensionally on the blue field, bridging the topologically deformed field of action.But that field of action is not so statically curved, but rather a dynamic topological field, which constantly changes the state of its quantity distribution, like a sea surface stirred up by the storm.

The blue box shows a coordinate grid, from the point of view of a photon.

The curved topological field shows the effects and the purple field shows what we see from the outside. But here in the illustration, the actually dynamic topological field always shows the spatial state that the field will have only after the movement has reached the same spatial position.

So what we see there as a topological field would be the present experienced over time.Thus, the photon reaches some places much earlier and is then on a completely different coordinate, which could not have been achieved straight without curvature.

The difference of the actual experienced path on the purple field to the blue is interpreted as invisible force and call it gravity.Only in this way can a mutual encounter ultimately occur and only in this way can stable perimeter, scattering or rarely also collisions of the photons occur.

**How can I speed up something that is already moving at the speed of light?**What is mass ?

A photon moves exclusively at the speed of light, because this is the only possible speed in this universe.Other velocities are always only vectorial sums of matter whose inner particles orbit each other. A complex process of what I say in the article “How**does matter arise?”** described.

**Matter consists of more than one particle,•xa0that move at the speed of light.**

It does not matter how you want to call the particles or what properties they have, because it only depends on the plural, so there must be several particles, only then do the parts fulfill a relationship to each other, namely the direction of motion.

But those particles will orbit each other. In quantum theory, this structure is regarded as the cloud of the still undetermined probabilities.

If now the inner particles are influenced by electromagnetic or gravitational fields, then this can change the direction of the inner movements (blue arrows), so that the vectors of the inner particles form another sum in the direction and velocity ( red arrow) . Because the sum of the speed of several particles at a constant light speed is always smaller than the speed of light.And the direction of movement now determines how fast that will be.

**Conclusion: “So, what is mass?**

Mass is the vectorial sum of all the vector parameters involved of the inner particles of matter.It is a combined effect of movement and direction, which is particularly noticeable in a gravitational environment and thus resists the speed of light.

**What is mass and why is it repeatedly confused with matter.**

In short, mass is an effect in a field of gravity that prevents an object from moving at the speed of light.

The property of the mass can capture and calculate the standard model, but cannot yet explain it, because the connection has not yet been recognized, but it is agreed that the model of imagination is obviously not suitable for the problem. to solve it.This amount is therefore my very own interpretation of the known facts.

The first most important fact is that only matter has mass, and both are often equated.But on the one hand matter is the present object and on the other hand the mass is its future effect on movement in a gravitational field. Therefore, mass cannot be attractive because it is not a thing, but matter is the thing that is attractive.

Matter also has other effects besides mass, including the gravitational and thus also the electromagnetic, as well as the inner spin, whereby this is now again associated with movement, from which also the mass originates.There is therefore an inner movement, which must in any case represent a hindrance to the straight forward direction of the object. For a spin would certainly not be detectable if the inner directions of the movements all showed in the same direction.

And it is precisely with this direction of movement that we will have an instrument with which we can explain the disability.We also know this as inertia, i.e. to oppose the speed of light. Because if two horses pull on a cart but run in different directions, then the car will probably never be able to reach the maximum possible speed. And that is exactly what the mass should be.

But there was still this effect in a field of gravity.For mass, in other words, the rotating inner movement, does not represent the whole lot, but its special effect in a gravitational field. And that particular effect is the constant repetition of movement in a limited field of possible effects determined by the radius of its frequency. Gravity always affects movements only, whereby the distances towards the gravitational centre are always shorter and if the inner movements of the object constantly pass through the shorter distances, then this becomes the difference in the length of the distances towards gravitational Centre.

But there was also the increase in mass and speed at the end.The increase is merely the better alignment of the inner movements in a common direction and these can only be effected by other gravitational fields. The remarkable thing, however, is the enduring character of the direction of movement. Because the moving object retains this changed inner direction of the movements, because there are no resetting effects of its own. And with this, an as yet uninterpreted effect on what the whole world is looking for shows. It is another way of transmitting the alternating effects, i.e. not the effect altered by quantum, but the effect of a changed direction.

In concrete terms, this means that the search for the gravitational is illusory and the 2.type of interaction is transmitted without substance.This is just described here is actually a sensation, but it is collectively ignored, you experience it live, never a layman will come and show the stinkfinger to the entire physical faculties.

**How does mass define itself.**

**Fermions:** I understand a particle that has no mass exclusively as a singular **photon,**as the basic building block of all matter, which moves exclusively at the speed of light.A gluon is also a photon, but it refers more to the plural or the property in connection with several particles or Quantum. In my opinion, a photon should not be included in the list of fermions, because it is already included as gluon in the list.

**Quantums **are the particles that make up matter.A quantum is just a collective term for the whole particles from the list of fermions, which differ in sizes such as mass, spin, charge and name. A quantum is thus a generalized volume of space that does not move at the speed of light (with the exception of the gluon), so the focus of a quantum here is on the plural. Spin, charge and mass describe special properties that indicate different processes of internal movements.

**Mass** denotes inertia, that is, the vectorial circumstance that opposes a straight parallel alignment of several quanta in order to reach the speed of light.So the focus here is on the plural of quantum, because matter is not a single quantum. As a mass, I therefore understand the sum of all the opening angles of all the vectors involved, which oppose the parallel course of the direction of the motion.

I now put it in a very simplified way, to what extent the opening angle is involved in slowing down the matter.

Particularly special is the dependence on the sinusoidal scaling of the relationships.

Each vector has the speed of light, which greatly simplifies the idea and calculation.I always place the 1st vector horizontally on the X axis and the 2nd vector vertically on the Y axis, so a layman can still understand this well. The whole thing becomes a little more demanding when a 3rd vector on the Z axis has to be taken into account. And the whole thing becomes even more demanding when one now considers that even the elementary particles, which mass possess inevitably must also have on such relationships. Because they wouldn’t have mass, like a photon or gluon.

**Ups, **we’re sitting at a point where it’s no longer easy to determine.Because I do not know how a singular, in its innermost being, comes to such a steady self-circumference that the spin interacts completely differently on a gravitational field. The ordinary composite of matter is explained by the majority of the particles involved. And the Higgs boson is not at all contained in the building blocks of matter itself, such as in the electron and that has a well-known mass and the significantly higher mass of the Higgs boson makes me strongly doubt that it is in an electron so that it is also mass or that an electron is just another material container for even smaller elementary particles.

Because the next dependence, which we always overlook, finds its origin in the mutual orbits, whereby the individual particles on an orbit constantly cross the shorter distances towards the center of a gravitational field and thereby constantly time differences.What the outside observer now again grasps as a relative increase in speed.

Thus, mass is an effect on the gravitational field, whereby this can only refer to the actual distance travelled.This is because the orbits take place on the circumference of the orbit, which must be multiplied by the number of orbits (frequency) in order to calculate the correct distance of the effect.

Thus, mass is dependent on an inner particle movement, which is often overlooked and generalized, and especially the direction of the movements of all the particles involved that prevents the material from moving parallel to the speed of light.

*….. further text follows…*